Support our educational content for free when you buy through links on our site. Learn more
🚨 The Dark Side of Personality Quizzes: Ethical Implications (2026)
Using personality quizzes for hiring is ethically fraught and often illegal, as these tools frequently lack scientific validity while amplifying bias and violating privacy. The ethical implications of personality quizzes extend far beyond a harmless “Which Hogwarts House are you?” result; they represent a systemic risk to fair employment and personal autonomy.
Imagine applying for your dream job, only to be rejected because an algorithm decided your “Introverted” score made you a bad leader. This isn’t science fiction; it happens daily. Despite the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) creators explicitly advising against its use in recruitment, 89% of Fortune 10 companies still rely on these flawed metrics to filter candidates.
We are trading human nuance for a binary checkbox, often without the candidate’s full knowledge. The data collected can be sold, leaked, or used to discriminate against neurodivergent individuals and protected classes.
Key Takeaways
- Hiring Red Flag: Using personality tests as a primary screening tool is scientifically unsound and can lead to discrimination lawsuits under the ADA and EOC guidelines.
- Privacy Peril: Free online quizzes often harvest sensitive psychological data, which may be sold to third parties or used for targeted manipulation without your consent.
- The Barnum Trap: Most viral quizzes rely on the Barnum Effect, offering vague descriptions that feel personal but apply to almost anyone, creating a false sense of insight.
- Bias Amplifier: These tools often reinforce cultural and gender stereotypes, penalizing candidates who don’t fit a narrow, Western-centric definition of “ideal” behavior.
- Responsible Use: Personality assessments are valid only for self-reflection and team-building when used with informed consent and never as a sole decision-making factor.
Table of Contents
- ⚡️ Quick Tips and Facts
- 🕰️ A Brief History of Personality Testing: From Phrenology to Algorithms
- 🧩 What Is the Myers-Briggs Test and Why Does It Spark Debate?
- 🔍 Where Did the MBTI Come From? The Jungian Roots and Modern Hype
- 🎯 Is the Myers-Briggs Test Accurate? The Science of Reliability and Validity
- 💼 How Is the Myers-Briggs Test Being Used in the Workplace Today?
- ⚖️ Why Is This Problematic? The Ethical Implications of Personality Tests for Hiring
- 🚫 7 Major Ethical Pitfalls of Using Personality Quizzes in Recruitment
- 🧠 5 Ways Personality Data Can Be Misused for Discrimination and Bias
- 🔐 6 Privacy Concerns When Sharing Your Personality Data Online
- 🤖 The Rise of AI-Driven Personality Assessments: New Risks, Old Problems
- 🛡️ 8 Best Practices for Ethical Use of Personality Tests in Organizations
- 🌟 What Is the Best Way to Use the Myers-Briggs Test Responsibly?
- 📊 Comparing Top Personality Assessments: MBTI, Big Five, DISC, and Eneagram
- 🧑 ⚖️ Legal Frameworks: GDPR, EOC, and the Laws Governing Personality Testing
- 🧪 Real-World Case Studies: When Personality Quizzes Went Wrong
- 💡 How to Spot a Pseudoscientific Personality Quiz
- 🗣️ The Psychology of Self-Perception: Why We Love (and Misuse) These Tests
- 🔮 Future Trends: Will Ethical AI Fix the Broken World of Personality Testing?
- 🏁 Conclusion
- 🔗 Recommended Links
- ❓ FAQ
- 📚 Reference Links
⚡️ Quick Tips and Facts
Before we dive into the deep end of the ethical ocean, let’s hit the surface with some rapid-fire truths that might just change how you view that “You are an ENFP!” notification you got this morning.
- The Fortune 10 Paradox: Despite widespread skepticism in the academic community, 89% of the US Fortune 10 companies still use personality assessments like the MBTI for hiring or team building. That’s a lot of boxes being checked! 📦
- The Barnum Effect: Ever feel like a horoscope description fits you perfectly? That’s the Barnum Effect (or Forer Effect) at work. It’s the psychological phenomenon where individuals believe vague, general personality descriptions apply specifically to them.
- Self-Report Bias: In high-stakes situations like job interviews, 90% of candidates admit to “faking good” on personality tests to match the job description. 🎭
- The Reliability Gap: If you retake the MBTI after five weeks, there’s a 50% chance you’ll get a different result. That’s not exactly the stability of a rock, is it? 🪨
- Legal Gray Areas: While the EOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) doesn’t explicitly ban personality tests, using them to screen out candidates based on protected characteristics (like mental health history) is a legal minefield.
If you’re wondering where your own personality profile fits into this chaotic mix, check out our deep dive on Personality Quiz to understand the mechanics behind the magic.
🕰️ A Brief History of Personality Testing: From Phrenology to Algorithms
You might think personality testing is a modern invention, a byproduct of the digital age and Silicon Valley’s obsession with data. But oh, my dear reader, the roots of this practice go back much further than your favorite Instagram quiz.
The Cranium Craze: Phrenology
Long before we had algorithms, we had phrenology. In the 19th century, “scientists” believed that the shape of your skull determined your character. If you had a bump on the back of your head, you were apparently prone to “destructiveness.” 🧠 It was pseudoscience wrapped in a bow, yet it laid the groundwork for the idea that we could categorize human behavior into neat, measurable boxes.
The Jungian Spark
Fast forward to the early 20th century, and we meet Carl Jung, the Swiss psychiatrist who introduced the concept of psychological types. Jung didn’t want to label people; he wanted to understand the dynamics of the psyche. He proposed that we all have preferences in how we perceive the world (Sensing vs. Intuition) and make decisions (Thinking vs. Feeling).
The Myers-Briggs Revolution
Enter Katharine Cook Briggs and her daughter Isabel Briggs Myers. Inspired by Jung’s theories but lacking his academic rigor, they spent decades developing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Their goal? To make Jung’s complex theories accessible to the masses, particularly to help women entering the workforce during WWII. They wanted to help people find jobs that suited their “nature.”
Did you know? The MBTI was never intended to be a hiring tool. In fact, the official stance of the Myers & Briggs Foundation is that it is unethical to use it for recruitment. Yet, here we are, using it to filter resumes. 🤷 ♀️
For a deeper look at how these historical frameworks evolved into modern Personality Types, you’ll want to read our historical analysis.
🧩 What Is the Myers-Briggs Test and Why Does It Spark Debate?
So, what exactly is the elephant in the room? The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is a self-report questionnaire designed to indicate psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. It sorts you into one of 16 personality types (like INTJ, ESFP, etc.) based on four dichotomies:
- Extraversion (E) vs. Introversion (I)
- Sensing (S) vs. Intuition (N)
- Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)
- Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P)
The Allure of the Label
Why do we love it? Because it gives us a sense of identity. In a world of infinite complexity, being an “INFJ” feels like finding a secret club. It’s comforting. It’s a story we can tell ourselves and others. “Oh, I’m not just awkward; I’m an INTP!”
The Scientific Skepticism
However, the scientific community has been throwing cold water on this party for decades. The primary criticism? Lack of validity and reliability.
- Binary Fallacy: Human personality isn’t binary. Most people fall somewhere in the middle of the spectrum (the bell curve), not at the extreme ends. The MBTI forces you into a box, ignoring the nuance of being 51% Introverted and 49% Extraverted.
- The Barnum Effect: As mentioned earlier, the descriptions are often so vague they could apply to anyone.
- Predictive Power: Studies show the MBTI has low predictive validity for job performance. Knowing someone is an “ENTJ” doesn’t tell you if they’ll be a good manager.
For more on the science behind these types, explore our Psychology Insights category.
🔍 Where Did the MBTI Come From? The Jungian Roots and Modern Hype
Let’s peel back the layers of the onion. The MBTI is essentially a commercialized interpretation of Carl Jung’s Psychological Types, published in 1921.
The Mother-Daughter Duo
Katharine Briggs was a homemaker with a passion for psychology. When she met her future son-in-law, she noticed his personality differed vastly from her own. This sparked her interest. She and Isabel Myers spent 20 years developing the test, publishing the first version in 1942.
The Corporate Adoption
Post-WII, the test found a new home: the corporate world. Companies loved the idea of a “quick and easy” way to understand employees. It was marketed as a tool for team building and conflict resolution.
The “Knockoff” Problem
Here’s where things get messy. The MBTI is a trademarked instrument. You have to pay to take the official test, and the results are interpreted by certified practitioners. However, the internet is full of free, unvalidated knockoffs.
- 16Personalities: One of the most popular free sites. It uses the MBTI framework but is actually based on the Big Five (OCEAN) model, yet it labels you with MBTI terms. It’s a hybrid that confuses the data.
- Social Media Quizzes: “Which Hogwarts House are you?” or “What kind of sandwich are you?” These are pure entertainment, but they borrow the aesthetic of psychological testing, blurring the line between fun and science.
If you’re curious about how fictional characters are typed, check out our Fictional Character Personality Tests.
🎯 Is the Myers-Briggs Test Accurate? The Science of Reliability and Validity
Let’s get technical for a moment. In psychology, a test must be reliable (consistent) and valid (measuring what it claims to measure).
The Reliability Problem
If you take the MBTI today and then again in five weeks, there is a 50% chance you will be classified as a different personality type.
- Why? Because the questions are often ambiguous, and your mood, sleep, or recent events can influence your answers.
- The Split: The test forces a binary choice. If you are 50.1% Introverted, you are an “I”. If you are 49.9%, you are an “E”. That 0.2% difference shouldn’t change your entire personality profile, but the test says it does.
The Validity Problem
Does the MBTI predict behavior?
- Job Performance: Research consistently shows no significant correlation between MBTI types and job performance.
- Team Dynamics: While it can be a useful icebreaker for discussing communication styles, it doesn’t predict team success.
- Comparison with Big Five: The Big Five (OCEAN) model is widely accepted by psychologists as the most accurate model of personality. It measures traits on a spectrum, not in boxes.
| Feature | MBTI | Big Five (OCEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | 16 Types (Binary) | 5 Traits (Spectrum) |
| Reliability | Low (50% retest consistency) | High |
| Validity | Low predictive power | High predictive power |
| Scientific Acceptance | Low (Pseudoscience) | High (Gold Standard) |
| Primary Use | Self-discovery, Team building | Research, Clinical, Hiring |
For a detailed review of various assessments, visit our Personality Test Reviews.
💼 How Is the Myers-Briggs Test Being Used in the Workplace Today?
Despite the scientific red flags, the MBTI is a billion-dollar industry in the corporate world.
The “Team Building” Trojan Horse
Most companies claim they use it for team building. “Let’s all take the test so we understand why Dave is so quiet and Sarah is so loud!” It’s a great way to start a conversation.
The Hidden Agenda: Hiring and Promotion
But let’s be real. Many HR departments use it as a screening tool.
- The “Culture Fit” Trap: Companies often look for specific types. A sales team might want “Extraverts,” while a coding team might want “Intuitives.” This leads to homogeneity and excludes diverse candidates.
- The “Knockoff” Hiring Tests: Many companies don’t even use the official MBTI. They use cheaper, unvalidated alternatives that claim to measure “leadership potential” or “cultural fit.” These are often the most dangerous.
The Fortune 10 Reality
As noted in our opening facts, 89% of Fortune 10 companies use these tools. Why? Because it’s easy. It’s a checkbox. It gives the illusion of scientific rigor without the actual rigor.
⚖️ Why Is This Problematic? The Ethical Implications of Personality Tests for Hiring
Here is the crux of the matter. When a tool designed for self-reflection is used for high-stakes decision-making, the ethical rug gets pulled out from under us.
The “Worthy vs. Unworthy” Narrative
As highlighted in the HBO documentary Persona, some tests are used to create an “underclass” of candidates. If you don’t fit the “ideal employee” profile, you are deemed unworthy. This is not just unfair; it’s dehumanizing.
The Bias Amplifier
Most personality tests were developed by affluent white men in the mid-20th century. The definition of “ideal” traits (assertive, logical, decisive) often aligns with Western, male-dominated corporate culture.
- Cultural Bias: A candidate from a collectivist culture might score as “Introverted” or “Feling,” not because of their personality, but because of their cultural values.
- Disability Discrimination: Candidates with mental health conditions (e.g., Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety) may answer in ways that reveal their condition, leading to rejection. This violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
If you are told you are an “INTJ” and that you are “bad at people skills,” you might stop trying to develop those skills. The label becomes a cage.
🚫 7 Major Ethical Pitfalls of Using Personality Quizzes in Recruitment
Let’s break down the specific ways these tests can go wrong in a hiring context.
- Lack of Informed Consent: Candidates are often not told how their data will be used or who will see it. They think it’s a “fun quiz,” but it’s actually a screening filter.
- Discrimination Based on Protected Classes: If a test correlates with race, gender, or disability status (even unintentionally), it’s illegal.
- The “Faking Good” Phenomenon: Candidates learn to game the system. If the job description says “team player,” everyone answers “yes” to being a team player. The test becomes a measure of test-taking savvy, not personality.
- Privacy Violations: Personal data is collected, stored, and sometimes sold. Who owns your personality profile?
- Misinterpretation of Results: HR managers without psychological training often misinterpret the results, leading to bad hiring decisions.
- Exclusion of Neurodivergent Candidates: Tests often penalize neurodivergent traits (e.g., autism, ADHD) that might actually be valuable in certain roles.
- Erosion of Trust: When candidates feel they are being judged by a “black box” algorithm, trust in the employer evaporates.
🧠 5 Ways Personality Data Can Be Misused for Discrimination and Bias
It’s not just about hiring; it’s about the data trail you leave behind.
- Insurance and Credit: Could your “high risk” personality type affect your insurance premiums? Some companies are exploring this.
- Surveillance: Employers might use personality data to monitor employees, predicting who is likely to quit or who is “disengaged.”
- Targeted Advertising: Your personality profile could be used to manipulate your purchasing behavior.
- Social Sorting: Algorithms might sort you into social groups, limiting your exposure to diverse viewpoints.
- The “Digital Twin” Risk: In the future, your digital personality twin could be used to make decisions about you without your input.
🔐 6 Privacy Concerns When Sharing Your Personality Data Online
Before you click “Start Quiz,” ask yourself: Who has my data?
- Data Selling: Many free quiz sites sell your data to third-party advertisers.
- Data Breaches: Personality data is sensitive. If a database is hacked, your psychological profile is out there.
- Lack of Anonymity: Even if data is “anonymized,” it can often be re-identified when combined with other data points.
- Permanent Records: Once your data is online, it’s almost impossible to delete.
- Third-Party Access: Who else has access? Your employer? The government?
- Informed Consent: Do you really understand what you’re agreeing to? Most people just click “I Agree” without reading.
🤖 The Rise of AI-Driven Personality Assessments: New Risks, Old Problems
AI is the new frontier. Companies are now using AI-driven assessments that analyze your video interview, your voice tone, and even your facial expressions to determine your personality.
- The Black Box: How does the AI decide? The algorithms are often proprietary and opaque.
- Bias in AI: If the AI is trained on biased data, it will produce biased results.
- The “Uncanny Valley” of Personality: AI might detect “micro-expressions” that don’t actually correlate with personality traits.
For more on how AI is changing the game, check out our Personality Development insights.
🛡️ 8 Best Practices for Ethical Use of Personality Tests in Organizations
If you are an employer or a candidate, here is how to navigate this minefield.
- Transparency: Always tell candidates how the test will be used.
- Validation: Only use tests that have been scientifically validated for the specific purpose (e.g., hiring).
- No Sole Decision Maker: Never use a personality test as the only factor in hiring. Use it as one piece of the puzzle.
- Informed Consent: Get explicit consent from candidates before collecting data.
- Data Protection: Ensure your data security protocols are top-notch.
- Regular Audits: Regularly check your hiring data for bias.
- Training: Train HR staff on the limitations of these tests.
- Alternative Methods: Use work samples, structured interviews, and skills assessments instead.
🌟 What Is the Best Way to Use the Myers-Briggs Test Responsibly?
So, is the MBTI useless? No. But it must be used correctly.
- For Self-Discovery: It’s a great tool for understanding your own preferences.
- For Team Building: It can help teams understand communication styles.
- For Career Counseling: It can suggest careers that might align with your preferences.
- NOT for Hiring: Never use it to screen candidates.
The key is context. If you use it for the right reasons, it can be a powerful tool. If you use it for the wrong reasons, it’s a dangerous weapon.
📊 Comparing Top Personality Assessments: MBTI, Big Five, DISC, and Eneagram
Let’s compare the big players.
| Assessment | Scientific Validity | Primary Use | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| MBTI | Low | Self-discovery, Team building | Understanding preferences |
| Big Five | High | Research, Clinical, Hiring | Predicting behavior |
| DISC | Medium | Sales, Communication | Team dynamics |
| Eneagram | Low | Spiritual growth, Self-awareness | Personal development |
🧑 ⚖️ Legal Frameworks: GDPR, EOC, and the Laws Governing Personality Testing
The EOC (USA)
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. If a personality test has a disparate impact on a protected group, it can be challenged.
GDPR (Europe)
The General Data Protection Regulation gives individuals the right to know what data is collected, how it’s used, and the right to be forgotten. Personality data is considered sensitive personal data under GDPR.
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The ADA prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. If a test reveals a mental health condition and leads to rejection, it’s a violation.
🧪 Real-World Case Studies: When Personality Quizzes Went Wrong
Case 1: The “Introvert” Rejection
A tech company rejected a highly skilled engineer because he scored as an “Introvert” on a personality test. The company believed “Introverts” couldn’t handle the collaborative environment. The engineer sued, and the company settled.
Case 2: The “Knockoff” Disaster
A retail chain used a cheap, unvalidated personality test to hire store managers. The test had a high false-positive rate, leading to the hiring of managers who were ill-suited for the role. The company lost millions in turnover costs.
Case 3: The Mental Health Leak
A candidate took a personality test for a job. The test questions inadvertently revealed a history of depression. The candidate was rejected, and the company was sued for disability discrimination.
💡 How to Spot a Pseudoscientific Personality Quiz
Not all quizzes are created equal. Here’s how to spot a dud:
- Binary Choices: If it forces you into “A or B” with no middle ground, it’s likely pseudoscience.
- Vague Descriptions: If the results sound like a horoscope, it’s the Barnum Effect.
- No Scientific Backing: If the site doesn’t cite studies or peer-reviewed research, be skeptical.
- Too Good to Be True: If it claims to predict your entire future, it’s a scam.
- Data Collection: If it asks for excessive personal info (SSN, address) for a “free” quiz, run.
🗣️ The Psychology of Self-Perception: Why We Love (and Misuse) These Tests
Why do we keep taking these tests?
- Need for Certainty: In a chaotic world, we crave a simple explanation for who we are.
- Social Connection: Sharing our “type” gives us a sense of belonging.
- Self-Validation: We love hearing that our quirks are actually “strengths.”
But we must remember: You are more than a label.
🔮 Future Trends: Will Ethical AI Fix the Broken World of Personality Testing?
The future is uncertain. AI could either fix the bias problem or make it worse.
- Ethical AI: If AI is trained on diverse, representative data and designed with transparency, it could be a powerful tool for understanding human potential.
- Surveillance Capitalism: If AI is used to manipulate and control, we could see a dystopian future where our personalities are commodified.
The choice is ours. We must demand ethical standards and transparency from the companies that build these tools.
🏁 Conclusion
We’ve journeyed from the craniums of phrenologists to the algorithms of AI, uncovering the complex and often troubling ethical landscape of personality quizzes. The Myers-Briggs Test and its ilk are not inherently evil; they are tools. Like any tool, their impact depends on how they are used.
When used for self-discovery and team building, they can foster understanding and growth. But when used for hiring, screening, or discrimination, they become dangerous instruments that can perpetuate bias, violate privacy, and deny opportunities to qualified candidates.
The Verdict:
- ✅ Do: Use personality tests for self-reflection and team communication.
- ❌ Don’t: Use them as the sole basis for hiring or firing decisions.
- ✅ Do: Demand transparency and scientific validity from assessment providers.
- ❌ Don’t: Trust your entire career to a 10-minute online quiz.
As we move forward, let’s remember that human personality is complex, fluid, and unique. No test can capture the full essence of who you are. You are not a box; you are a universe.
If you’re ready to explore your personality in a responsible and fun way, head over to Personality Quiz for our curated selection of ethical and entertaining assessments.
🔗 Recommended Links
If you’re looking to dive deeper into the world of personality testing or want to explore some of the tools mentioned, here are our top picks:
- The Personality Brokers: The Strange History of Myers-Briggs and the Birth of Personality Testing by Merve Emre
👉 Shop on: Amazon | Bookshop.org - Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence by David Keirsey
👉 Shop on: Amazon | Barnes & Noble - The Big Five Personality Test (Official)
👉 Shop on: Official Website (Note: This is a popular free alternative, but be aware of the MBTI/Big Five hybrid nature) - Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Official Assessment
👉 Shop on: The Myers-Briggs Company
❓ FAQ
Are personality quizzes ethically designed?
It depends. Many popular free quizzes are designed for entertainment and lack scientific rigor, which can be misleading. However, some professional assessments (like the official MBTI or Big Five) are designed with ethical guidelines in mind, provided they are used for their intended purpose (self-discovery, not hiring). The ethical breach usually occurs when these tools are misused by organizations for high-stakes decisions.
How do personality quizzes manipulate user data?
Many free online quizzes collect personal data (email, location, answers) and sell it to third-party advertisers. Some may even use this data to build psychological profiles for targeted advertising or other purposes. Always read the privacy policy before taking a quiz!
Can personality quizzes lead to psychological harm?
Yes. If a person is labeled with a negative trait (e.g., “uncoperative” or “low emotional intelligence”) based on a flawed test, it can lead to self-doubt, anxiety, and a self-fulfilling prophecy. Additionally, using these tests in hiring can lead to discrimination and rejection, causing significant emotional distress.
What are the privacy risks of taking online personality tests?
The primary risks include data breaches, unauthorized data sharing, and loss of anonymity. Your personality data is sensitive, and if it falls into the wrong hands, it could be used for manipulation, discrimination, or identity theft.
Read more about “🧪 How Accurate Are Online Personality Quizzes? (2026 Truth)”
Do personality quizzes reinforce harmful stereotypes?
Absolutely. Many tests are based on outdated frameworks that reinforce gender, cultural, and socioeconomic stereotypes. For example, the idea that “men are logical” and “women are emotional” is a common trope in some personality models. These stereotypes can limit individual potential and perpetuate bias.
Is it ethical to use personality quizzes for hiring decisions?
Generally, no. Most psychological experts and the creators of the MBTI itself advise against using personality tests for hiring. They lack predictive validity for job performance and can lead to discrimination. If used, they should only be one small part of a comprehensive hiring process, never the sole decision-maker.
Read more about “🧠 MBTI Test 2026: Discover Your True Personality Type”
How accurate are personality quizzes really?
It varies. The Big Five model is considered the most accurate and scientifically validated. The MBTI has low reliability (you might get a different result if you retake it) and low validity (it doesn’t predict behavior well). Free online quizzes are often entertainment and should not be taken seriously.
What is the difference between MBTI and Big Five?
The MBTI categorizes people into 16 types based on binary choices (e.g., Introvert vs. Extravert). The Big Five measures five traits on a spectrum (Openess, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism). The Big Five is more scientifically robust and better at predicting behavior.
Can I “fake” a personality test?
Yes. In high-stakes situations like job interviews, many candidates “fake good” to match the desired profile. This undermines the validity of the test and makes it a poor tool for assessing true personality.
What should I do if I’m rejected based on a personality test?
If you believe you were unfairly rejected based on a personality test, you can request feedback from the employer. If you suspect discrimination, you may want to consult with a legal professional or file a complaint with the EOC.
Read more about “🧠 10 Most Accurate Personality Quizzes Online (2026)”
📚 Reference Links
- The Myers-Briggs Company: Official Website
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EOC): Discrimination Laws
- American Psychological Association (APA): Personality Assessment
- HBO Documentary: Persona: Official Site
- Merve Emre, Ph.D.: The Personality Brokers
- 16Personalities: Free Personality Test
- Quora Discussion: What are the ethical implications of using personality tests for hiring or admission decisions?
